Even If you do not Call me, You should still get a lawyer: 2023 Case Example

Even if you do not call me, you should still call a lawyer if you have been in an auto accident.

The following case is a prime example why handling your own car accident case is not a good idea. In this recent July 2023 Virginia car accident case, the Court excluded from evidence vital pices of evidence, the medical bills, because proper process was not followed by a person representing themselves. I can provide a free Car accident lawyer consultation (434) 660-9701

The truth is that the insurance company had representation for this, a staff ALLSTATE insurance attorney. The pro se or person representing themself never really had a chance.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Following a jury trial, Amy Breslin, pro se, appeals an order awarding her compensatory damages for personal injuries she sustained because of a motor-vehicle accident. On appeal, she argues that the circuit court erred by excluding certain medical bills from evidence. After examining the briefs and record in this case, the panel unanimously holds that oral argument is unnecessary because "the appeal is wholly without merit." Code § 17.1-403(ii)(a); Rule 5A:27(a). For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

BACKGROUND
On December 20, 2018, Breslin filed a complaint in the circuit court against Elizabeth Ballew to recover for injuries Breslin sustained in a motor-vehicle accident. According to Breslin, Ballew's vehicle "suddenly made a left turn into" her vehicle, causing a collision that resulted in Breslin's injuries. During the discovery process, Breslin filed a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued to Dr. Oliver,
arguing that the subpoena omitted statutorily required language, was overly broad, and sought confidential medical information. The record does not include a copy of the subpoena duces tecum. The circuit court denied the motion to quash, and Breslin endorsed its order as "[s]een and agreed."

On August 30, 2022, Breslin filed an "Updated and Proposed Exhibit List," identifying an "Amended
Statement of Medical Bills" as one of her exhibits. Ballew filed a written objection to the proposed exhibit on the basis that it was hearsay, not timely produced in discovery, not authentic, and without foundation. Notwithstanding her objections, Ballew stated that she did "not object to the introduction of any medical bills or summary thereof to the extent such bills were previously timely produced in discovery."

The case proceeded to trial on September 13, 2022. The record does not include a transcript or a written
statement of facts in lieu of a transcript from the trial. The record, however, does include two exhibits entitled "Patient Ledger" and "Amended Statement of Medical Bills/Damages," purportedly relating to treatment by Dr. Christopher Oliver, offered by Breslin at trial (collectively the "medical bills"). The record reflects that the circuit court excluded the medical bills from evidence. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Breslin, and the circuit court entered a final order awarding her $5,000 in compensatory damages. Breslin appeals.

ANALYSIS
On appeal, Breslin contends that the circuit court erred by excluding the medical bills from evidence upon Ballew's objection. Although she does not identify the specific objection that Ballew raised at trial, Breslin asserts that exclusion of the medical bills was improper because Ballew had previously received them in response to her subpoena duces tecum. Breslin also argues that the medical bills provide "necessary information to determine damages" permitted by statute. "On appeal, we presume the judgment of the trial court is correct[.]" Bay v. Commonwealth, 60 Va.App. 520, 528 (2012). "The burden is upon the appellant to provide [the appellate court] with a record which substantiates the
claim of error. In the absence [of a sufficient record], we will not consider the point." Dixon v. Dixon, 71 Va.App. 709, 716 (2020) (alterations in original) (quoting Robinson v. Robinson, 50 Va.App. 189, 197 (2007)). "The transcript of any proceeding is a part of the record when it is filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court no later than 60 days after entry of the final judgment." Rule 5A:8(a). "When the appellant fails to ensure that the record contains transcripts or a written statement of facts necessary to permit resolution of appellate issues, any assignments of error affected by such omission will not be considered." Rule 5A:8(b)(4)(ii). Indeed, if "the transcript [or statement of facts] is indispensable to the determination of the case, then the requirements for making the transcript [or statement of facts] a part of the record on appeal must be strictly adhered to." Bay, 60 Va.App. at 528 (alterations in
original) (quoting Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va.App. 96, 99 (1986)).

In this case, Breslin did not file a transcript or a written statement of facts in lieu of a transcript with the
circuit court. In the absence of a transcript or a written statement of facts in lieu of a transcript, the Court cannot determine the nature of Ballew's objection to the medical bills, whether Breslin opposed the objection, or the basis for the circuit court's ruling. Indeed, Breslin concedes on appeal that she was "without . . . ability to decode how to overcome" Ballew's objection at trial. Under these circumstances, we conclude that a trial transcript, or a written statement of facts in lieu of a transcript, is indispensable to a determination of Breslin's assignment of error raised on appeal. See Bay, 60 Va.App. at 528-29; Shiembob v. Shiembob, 55 Va.App. 234, 246 (2009); Anderson v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 506, 508-09 (1992); Turner, 2 Va.App. at 99-100. Accordingly, her arguments are waived. Rule 5A:8(b)(4) (ii).

CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the circuit court's judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed

Please note that none of the foregoing is legal advice nor should it be considered a legal advertisement, if you have a legal matter you should most likely contact an attorney. Even if you decide not to call me you should probably still get in contact with an Attorney. Chris White Lawyer, LLC. is a Lynchburg, Virginia Law Firm. Available for consultations in person, via Facetime, Skype, Zoom or phone (434) 660-9701. Please also check out my practice areas in Criminal Defense Attorney and Car Accidents. At my Law Firm we focus on the best result for the client. To stay connected I have a YoutubeInstagramFacebookTwitterLinkedInTumblrBloggerRedditYelpAvvo and JustiaSecurity Clearance Attorney

Chris White lawyer, LLC

Cellphone: (434) 660-9701

Available with appointment (434) 660-9701:

700 12th St, Lynchburg, VA 24504

Available with appointment (434) 660-9701:

100 Tradewynd Dr. Lynchburg, VA 24502

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram